Clackamas County Lawful Government Alliance
CO: Charles Bruce, Stewart
39275 Hood St. # D
Sandy Oregon
668-3932

To: Clackamas County Sheriff Ris Bradshaw
Re: Re-Establishing Lawful Government in Clackamas County
January 31, 2000

Sheriff Bradshaw,
            It was good to get your verbal phone affirmation on the date of 26/1/2000 to the effect that you would soon respond to my past letter by way of your own written letter, & with a quickly thereunder follow-up meeting sir. I do hope that thinger follow-up meeting sir. I do hope that things are coming together therein in a timely manner for you. If I can be of any assistance in any manner therein, please contact me.

            Accompanying this document please find a fax/email which was recently sent to Commissioner/Judge Kennemer, with copies within a few days hereafter to Commissioners Sowa & Jordan. I feel these developments are of such significance as to necessitate your awareness of them.
&nbsthem.
            Also, in accompaniment hereto, is background letters which have transpired between our "Clackamas County Lawful Government Alliance" group & the Commissioner/Judges. Actually I believe all of them were directed to Larry Sowa, however as he was therein directed to share them with others as he deemed best, & he did exercise this authority to delegate responses to County Attorney Myles Ward, it is reasonably assumablbly assumable that the other Commissioner/Judges were aware of these letters from the very dates upon which they were sent, as indicated on each document. These ones have been noticed to deny in a timely manner these concerns that they have been informed of these things from the outset, if such is the case. They have failed to respond with any such denial of awareness of these matters as they were occurring.
            And at any ra And at any rate, I just emailed copies of all of these letters to both of the other Commissioner/Judges, so now at least they are all certainly fully aware of the events based thereon.
            It may be good for you to ask Larry Sowa's assistent Ginny Van Loo for copies of all responsive communications which have come forth from that office, including that of Attorney Myles Ward. Perhaps you already have these materials, however, ifs, however, if not, this would be good to have in your files.

            Further, If you have an EMail Address, that would facilitate a quicker "Meeting of the Minds" process between our different groups. EMail is very much quicker for interaction than all other forms of type based communications. Line by line & point by point responses are easily inserted without the necessity of re-typing the entire point sought to be addressed. Whetressed. Whether your responsive letter is already in the regular postal mail or not, if you could EMail a copy of it to me, at my EMail address below; that would assist in our moving towards these ends of securing mutually recognizable "Lawful Government" for Clackamas County more quickly.

New Questions & Points:
            We would like herein to follow-up with a few more points/questions concerning how you vieng how you view applicable "Law" to some possibly soon unfolding developments. Please do not allow these concerns to deter the timeliness of your already out-going response to our previous questions. If some or all of these answers can quickly be banged into that document, then by all means please do-so. However, precedent seems to have been set over at the offices of the Commissioner/ Judges, that it is unavoidable that any time a new question is presented to them, they absolutely seem to loose tm to loose their ability to focus upon mere efficiency of communications, & they seem to necessitate re-doing everything all over again from the ground up.
            I truly hope that such dysfunctionalities are not afflicting your good offices. Just take some more time to respond to these issues, if such is necessary. Please do not delay your already surely partially finished response to our group as promised. The additional queadditional questions we are presenting to you are as follows:

1:             Under the sought soon to be re-formed & resurrected Article 7 Section 1 General Jurisdiction "Clackamas County Court" is properly called into existence, under proper "Due Course & Process of Law"; & If hereunder it becomes clear to all "Reasonable" People in attendance upon said "County Court" that Commissioner/Judge Kennemier or any others are sy others are sadly & regrettable purposefully & Criminally Abusing their Positions as Senior-Members of the Governing-Body of Clackamas-County or other positions of Influence, all so-as-to effect the furtherance of "Breaches of the Peace" against "We the People" of this County, as recognizable under "Duties of Sheriff" at ORS 206.010; & thereby said Commissioner/Judges &/or County Attorneys are either directly or indirectly assisting in the commission of such Class A Felony or otA Felony or other Crimes as Kidnaping, Theft, Extortion, Assault, Racketeering, Obstruction of Justice, &/or Conspiracy with others to effect the same; & hereunder, If these Criminal Intents & Acts to "Breach the Peace" are Clearly Demonstrated to you:
            Will you proceed to make any such regrettable but Lawfully Necessary Arrests of any said Commissioner/Judges or County Attorneys or others for any such clearly appa clearly apparent "Breach of the Peace" related Felony Crimes as are thereunder clearly demonstrated ?
            In proper similar cases, Will you direct your Deputies to make such Arrests for such clearly apparent "Breach of the Peace" related Felony Crimes as this?

(This next series of questions has to do with how your Office will respond when one of the self-elected Constable/Peace-Officers of "We the People" attempts to effecttempts to effect an Arrest. As outlined in our previous letter to you, we believe that "We the People" have the Right under traditionally recognizable Common-Law & "County General Law" to provide for our own "Peace-Officers" under the Statutorily recognizable term "Constable. Hereunder, every 10 households may form special-townships of self-elected Constables, aka: "Peace-Officers" to effect Arrests of those who commit well recognizable & Peace-Breaching Public-General- -Law Criminal Offencminal Offences. Blacks Law Dictionary citations previously presented show that the 10-household number is that which was traditionally applicable among "Men of Good & Lawful Character" & Reputation in the Community under Common-Law.)

            ORS 133.005 & 161.015 specifically recognizes that these "Constables" are to be allowed to perform every function which is referred to in Statute as being within the Lawful Authoritywful Authority of "Peace-Officers". Those Statutes which specify these broad-reaching authorities of "Peace-Officers" (& thus of Constables) are at least in part summarized within ORS 133.033, 133.220, 133.235, 133.310, 133.315, 161.235, 161.239, 161.245, & 161.260.
            Hereunder, any time a recognizable "Breach of the Peace" "Malum-In-Se" Crime is committed, All Peace-Officers including Constables have a "Duty" under appy" under applicable "Law" to immediately effect an Arrest of the person so committing said Crime. This is all precisely as is the ORS 206.010 Statutorily recognizably "Duty" upon yourself Sheriff Bradshaw, as we are sure you are aware. This is all clear from such textbooks as "Anderson on Sheriffs" & other sources, which indicate that the "Constable" has Duties precisely similar to the Sheriff, only with a smaller "Community Care-taking Function".
              Hereunder, the questions we seek answers from you concerning this "Constable" issue is as follows:

            If, for some reason it seems to members of the Public that you or your deputies are not able to recognize that Criminal Activities are regrettably being committed by Commissioner/ /Judge Kennemier or other members of the Governing Body, County Attorneys, or other delinquent/malfeasant Publalfeasant Public- Servants; hereunder we see the following "Law" becoming applicable:
            When a Constable/Peace-Officer is attempting to make an Arrest, & he is in need of Assistance, & hereunder he "Commands" in the Name of the "Law" & the name of this "State of Oregon" that you or one of your Deputies "Assist" him in making an Arrest of said "Peace Breaching" Influential Public-Servants, that you or your deputies sour deputies so "Commanded" do forthwith & immediately render such "Assistance" to such Constable/Peace-Officer in making said Arrest.
            We find this to be one of your recognizable "Duties" under both Public-General County Common-Law, & under Statute as recognized in ORS 162.245.

2:             Hereunder, If it becomes clear to one of the properly self-electrly self-elected by "We the People" Peace-Officer/Constables that Commissioner/Judge Kennemier or said others is purposefully & Criminally Abusing his Position of Public Trust; all so-as-to effect the furtherance of "Breaches of the Peace" as recognizable under ORS 206.010 (1), & to the great damage to "We the People" within this County; & hereunder, If one of these properly self-elected Constable/Peace-Officers does proceed to attempt to make an Arrest of Commissioner/Judge KennemerJudge Kennemer or said others for said clearly apparent "Breach of the Peace" Crimes; Hereunder:
            May "We the People" of Clackamas County be assured that when "Commanded" by said Constable/Peace-Officer to "Assist" in said Arrest as this, that you & your Deputy Sheriff's will directly so "Assist" said Constable/Peace-Officer in effecting such an Arrest as this?

3:         &nbnbsp;     If the Answer to the proceeding question is No; May we at least be assured that you & your Deputy Sheriffs will at least Refrain from Actively Assisting in any "Escape" from the Custody of said Constable/Peace-Officer over such possible "Peace Breachers" as possibly Commissioner/ Judge Kennemer ?
            Said "Escape" would be Statutorily recognizable as an "Offense against the State & Public Je & Public Justice" of the magnitude of a "Class B Felony" as recognizable under ORS 162.165, & Any Others who so "Conspire" to assist in said "Escape" would be guilty of the same level of Class B Felony "Offense against the State & Public Justice" by way of that ORS 161.450 recognizable "Conspiracy" to commit the same. We perceive that if either yourself or your deputies should regrettably choose to Actively Interfere with such an Arrest of said Influential yet perceived "Peace Breachinace Breaching" Public-Servants, that such would be Conspiracy to violate ORS 161.260, which prohibits "Resisting Arrest" by any "Peace Officer", even if there are differences of opinion on applicable Law.
            Such differences of opinion as to applicable "Law" are to be settled later, & in "Court". During the Arrest is Not the time for different "Peace-Officers" to be wrestling around on the floor (or worse) over such differer such differences of opinion. This Statute is clearly designed under this sound Public-Policy to prevent such Embarrassments (or worse). We need to know if you & your deputies will Honor this Well Settled Principle of Common & Statutory Law, & we need to know this well before any such possible Embarrassments (or worse) occurs.

            If it is regrettably necessary for any Constable/Peace-Officer to Arrest Commissioner/ Commissioner/ /Judge Kennemer or others for "Peace-Breaching" Crimes against "We the People" of Clackamas County, & the Arrest is effectively completed, with a view towards the Article 1 Section 10 Constitutional "Without Delay" Trail of said Prisoner under "Due Course & Process of Law" with "Jury of his Peers Trail" (who must be though of "Good & Lawful Character") in the very soon to come together Article 7 Section 1 "County Court"; Hereunder:
4:     &nnbsp;     May said Constable/Peace-Officer commit said Prisoner Commissioner/Judge Kennemer or other similar "Peace-Breaching" Influential Public Servant Criminals to your "Correctional Facility" there in Oregon City, for the safe-keeping of such ones until proper Jury Trail within the County Court can thereunder be brought together?

5:         Also, If said Peace-Breacher" is Convicted of said Crimes in full accord with "Due Course &Due Course & Process of Law", may "We the People" of this County be assured that you will respect the Orders of the Jury of the "County Court" that said Convict should Serve-Out Fully any such Lawful Prison Sentence in your said "Correctional Facility" there in Oregon City ?

6:         If the answer to the previous question is "Yes", may the Constable/Peace-Officer who made the Arrest Gain Entry into the "Correctional Facility" at any time he soany time he so desires to check to be sure that everything is on the up & up with regards to making sure that said Influential Prisoner is Not being given any Special Favorable Treatment within said Correctional Facility?

Other Subject Focus:
7:         If "We the People" exercise our Article 1 Section Oregon Constitutional "All Power is Inherent in the People" authority to call together the Article 7 Section 1 General-JurisdictionJurisdiction "County-Court"; & said "We the People" call upon you to make Attendance upon said "County Court" as the "Ministerial Officer" thereto (as recognizable under both Article 7 Section 16, & ORS 206.010 (5)), Will You make such Attendance, & thereunder Execute such Warrants, Process, & other Orders as are Lawfully therein directed to You ?

8:         How many people are in your "Correctional Facility" presently, sir?

9: ?

9:         How many People in your "Correctional Facility" do Not have a File under your care & attached to each of them which Conclusively Evidences that the Incarceration of that Prisoner has been completed therein by way of Constitutionally recognizable "Due Course & Process of Law"?
            All so-called "Quasi-Crimes", & such as those lacking in evidencing that any "Mensthat any "Mens-Rea" (ORS 161.085 "Culpable Mental State"), or "Corpus Delecti" (Body Harmed), or other forms of "Malum-Prohibitum" Jurisdiction would fall into this category sir.

            If the answer to this last question is complex & time-consuming, a quick-rough "good-faith" estimate of the number of such prisoners will be sufficient.

Final Note:
          &;    Please be assured sir, that those of us organizing this perceived needed shift from DeFacto to Lawful Government, seek to keep to an absolute minimum all unnecessary social- trauma which could otherwise raise its head in this most serious undertaking. Under this policy, we seek to "Exhaust the Pathway of Peace" in working towards the Reasonable "Good-Faith" Achievement of these ends.
            Hereunder, & wheunder, & when Jury Trial concerning any & all Criminally Un-Lawful applications of the Force of the State & County which may have been committed by those among your department or elsewhere; If such ones will but merely humble themselves before these applicable General-Public & Godly "Laws" of "Peace", as Originally Intended under Oregon's Constitution; & they there-under exercise a "Good-Faith" diligence in stopping such behavior, & in assisting in effecting these sought afte sought after returns to "Lawful Government" within this County; Hereunder;
            Pleas will be made by ourselves organizing this transition before said Trail Juries, that in view of this "Good-Faith" renunciation of said past delinquent (or worse) behavior by said Public-Servants, hereunder should cause to issue the Utmost Liberal Amnesty Possible in recognition of said "Good-Faith" efforts.

     &np;         We look forward to working with you towards the end of a mutually recognizable "Lawful Government" in Clackamas County, sir.

Respectfully,

______________________________________
Charles Bruce, Stewart;
Clackamas County Lawful Government Alliance
EMail<charles@christiancommonlaw-gov.org>